CameraDecision
  • CAMERAS
    • All Cameras
    • Cameras by Brand
      • Sony Cameras
      • Canon Cameras
      • Nikon Cameras
      • Pentax Cameras
      • Fujifilm Cameras
      • Olympus Cameras
      • OM-System Cameras
      • Panasonic Cameras
      • Leica Cameras
    • Cameras by Body Type
      • Mirrorless Cameras
      • DSLR Cameras
      • Compact Cameras
      • Bridge Cameras
      • Waterproof Cameras
    • Cameras by Lens Mount
      • Sony E Mount Cameras
      • Canon RF Mount Cameras
      • Nikon Z Mount Cameras
      • Micro Four Thirds Mount Cameras
      • Fujifilm X Mount Cameras
      • Leica L Mount Cameras
      • Nikon F Mount Cameras
      • Canon EF Mount Cameras
      • Canon EF M Mount Cameras
      • Canon EF S Mount Cameras
      • Pentax KAF Mount Cameras
      • Sony Alpha Mount Cameras
      • Fujifilm G Mount Cameras
      • Sigma SA Mount Cameras
      • Nikon 1 Mount Cameras
  • LENSES
    • All Lenses
    • Lenses by Mount
      • Sony E Mount Lenses
      • Canon RF Mount Lenses
      • Nikon Z Mount Lenses
      • Canon EF Mount Lenses
      • Canon EF M Mount Lenses
      • Canon EF S Mount Lenses
      • Nikon F Mount Lenses
      • Fujifilm X Mount Lenses
      • Micro Four Thirds Mount Lenses
      • Leica L Mount Lenses
      • Pentax KAF Mount Lenses
      • Fujifilm G Mount Lenses
      • Sigma SA Mount Lenses
      • Sony Alpha Mount Lenses
    • Teleconverters
    • Cinema Lenses
      • Sony E Mount Cine Lenses
      • Canon RF Mount Cine Lenses
      • Nikon Z Mount Cine Lenses
      • Canon EF Mount Cine Lenses
      • Nikon F Mount Cine Lenses
      • ARRI PL Mount Cine Lenses
      • Fujifilm X Mount Cine Lenses
      • Micro Four Thirds Mount Cine Lenses
      • Leica L Mount Cine Lenses
  • TOOLS
    • Cameras
      • Smart Find
      • 1-on-1 Comparison
    • Lenses
      • Smart Find
      • 1-on-1 Comparison
  • BLOG

Canon 350 HS vs Fujifilm XQ2 Comparison

x
Camera to replace
Change

Canon ELPH 350 HS

20 MP | 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) BSI-CMOS Sensor

Canon ELPH 350 HS
CHECK PRICE
CHECK PRICE
Change

Fujifilm XQ2

12 MP | 2/3" (8.8 x 6.6 mm) CMOS X-TRANS II Sensor

Fujifilm XQ2
CHECK PRICE
CHECK PRICE
Canon ELPH 350 HS vs Fujifilm XQ2 Comparison Overview

In this review, we will be comparing the 350 HS and the XQ2, two Ultracompact cameras from Canon and Fujifilm. Canon ELPH 350 HS was introduced to the market in February 2015 and Fujifilm XQ2 was launched in January 2015. There is only 1 months difference between 350 HS and XQ2 so we are expecting this to be a fair comparison regarding age and technology level.

Here is a brief look at the main features of the Canon ELPH 350 HS and Fujifilm XQ2 before getting into our more detailed comparison.

Canon ELPH 350 HS Key Specs

  • Announcement Date: 2015-02-06
  • 20MP - 1/2.3" BSI-CMOS Sensor
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • 25-300 mm F3.6-7.0 Zoom Lens
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 3.00" Fixed Type Screen
  • 2.5fps continuous shooting
  • Full HD - 1920 x 1080 video resolution
  • Built-in Wireless
  • 147g. 100 x 58 x 23 mm
  • Also known as IXUS 275 HS

Fujifilm XQ2 Key Specs

  • Announcement Date: 2015-01-14
  • 12MP - 2/3' CMOS X-TRANS II Sensor
  • ISO 100 - 12800
  • 25-100 mm F1.8-4.9 Zoom Lens
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 3.00" Fixed Type Screen
  • 12.0fps continuous shooting
  • Full HD - 1920 x 1080 video resolution
  • Built-in Wireless
  • 206g. 100 x 59 x 33 mm
  • Replaced Fujifilm XQ1 Compare

Let's read on in the following sections in order to better understand in detail how the Canon ELPH 350 HS and Fujifilm XQ2 compare and hopefully end up with enough arguments to decide which one is better for you.


Related Blog Posts

Canon RF 28mm F2.8 STM Size Compared the most compact RF Mount Lenses: We have a Winner
Fujifilm XF 8mm F3.5 WR vs XF 8-16mm F2.8 R LM WR vs XF 10-24mm F4 R WR Size And Feature Comparison
Best MacBook Pro Deal for Photography and Videography
Sony A7R V, Panasonic S5 II, Canon R50 and OM 90mm Macro wins Camera GP Japan 2023 Awards
Daily Deals: Portable Recorder, CFExpress storage, Tripods and more
Best Selling Lenses in Sony E, Canon RF and Nikon Z Mounts in 2023
Canon PowerShot V10 Pocket-Sized Vlogging Camera Announced
Nikon Z8 II vs Canon R5 vs Sony A7R V vs Panasonic S5 Camera Size and Feature Comparison


**This post contains affiliate links, and I will be compensated if you make a purchase after clicking through my links. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases.

Reasons to choose Canon PowerShot ELPH 350 HS over Fujifilm XQ2
Sensor Resolution
20 MP vs 12 MP 66% more pixels
Battery Life
250 shots vs 240 shots 10 more frames with a single charge
Weight
147 g vs 206 g 59 g lighter
Focal Length - Tele
300mm vs 100mm 200 mm longer tele reach
Optical Zoom
12x vs 4× more flexible focal coverage
NFC Connection
Yes vs No Easy wireless connectivity with compatible devices
Smartphone Remote
Yes vs No Remote control your camera with a smartphone
CHECK 350 HS PRICE


Reasons to choose Fujifilm XQ2 over Canon PowerShot ELPH 350 HS
Internal Storage
66MB vs None Extra built-in storage
RAW Support
Yes vs No Better image quality
Max ISO
12.800 vs 3.200 300% higher Max ISO
LCD Resolution
920k dots vs 461k dots 99% higher resolution screen
Max Mech. Shutter
1/4000s vs 1/2000s faster mechanical shutter
Continuous Shooting
12.0fps vs 2.5fps 9.5 fps faster
Manual Exposure
Yes vs No better exposure control
Max Aperture - Wide
1.80 vs 3.60 faster lens at wide
Max Aperture - Tele
4.90 vs 7.00 faster lens at tele
Flash Coverage
7.4m vs 4.0m 3.4m longer range
Sensor Pixel Area
4.84µm2 vs 1.39µm2 248% larger pixel area
AE Bracketing
Yes vs No Useful for tough lighting conditions and HDR
CHECK XQ2 PRICE

Common Strengths of Canon PowerShot ELPH 350 HS and Fujifilm XQ2
Wireless Connection
Yes vs Yes Better connectivity
Image Stabilization
Optical vs Optical Sharper images at longer focal lengths and long exposures
Built-in Flash
Yes vs Yes Useful in low-light
Face Detection Focus
Yes vs Yes very handy for portraits
Common Weaknesses of Canon PowerShot ELPH 350 HS and Fujifilm XQ2
Fixed Screen
Fixed Type vs No Screen tilts or Flips out independently, perfect for both stills and video
External Flash Shoe
No vs No Not suitable for flash photography
Viewfinder
None vs None No eye-level shooting option
Environmental Sealing
No vs No not suitable for tough conditions
Canon ELPH 350 HS vs Fujifilm XQ2: Physical Specs and Body Features Comparison

Size and weight are big decision factors when you are trying to find the ideal camera for your needs. In this section, we are going to illustrate the Canon ELPH 350 HS and Fujifilm XQ2 side-by-side from the front, back and top in their relative dimensions. Canon ELPH 350 HS has external dimensions of 100 x 58 x 23 mm (3.94 x 2.28 x 0.91″) and weighs 147 g (0.32 lb / 5.19 oz) (including batteries). Fujifilm XQ2 has external dimensions of 100 x 59 x 33 mm (3.94 x 2.32 x 1.3″) and weighs 206 g (0.45 lb / 7.27 oz) (including batteries).

Below you can see the front-view size comparison of the Canon ELPH 350 HS and the Fujifilm XQ2. Canon ELPH 350 HS has the same height with Fujifilm XQ2. On the other hand, with a width of 58mm, it is 1 narrower and also with a thickness of 23mm, it is 10mm thinner than Fujifilm XQ2.

Canon ELPH 350 HS vs Fujifilm XQ2 Camera Size Comparison - Front View
Comparison image of the Canon ELPH 350 HS and the Fujifilm XQ2 Size, Weight and External Dimensions - Front View

Here is the back view size comparison of the Canon ELPH 350 HS and Fujifilm XQ2.

Canon ELPH 350 HS vs Fujifilm XQ2 Camera Size Comparison - Back View
Comparison image of the Canon ELPH 350 HS and the Fujifilm XQ2 Size and Weight - Back View

Now lets look at the top view comparison of Canon ELPH 350 HS and Fujifilm XQ2.
Canon ELPH 350 HS vs Fujifilm XQ2 Camera Size Comparison - Top View
Top View Comparison image of the Canon ELPH 350 HS and the the Fujifilm XQ2 Size

Weight is another important factor, especially when deciding on a camera that you want to carry with you all day. Canon ELPH 350 HS is significantly lighter (59g ) than the Fujifilm XQ2 which may become a big advantage especially on long walking trips.

Weight Comparison

Compact Cameras

350 HS
XQ2
Min
Average
Max
Thickness Comparison

Compact Cameras

350 HS
XQ2
Min
Average
Max

Weather Sealing

Unfortunately neither the Canon PowerShot ELPH 350 HS (IXUS 275 HS) nor Fujifilm XQ2 provides any type of weather sealing in their bodies, so you have to give extra care especially when you are shooting outdoors. If weather sealing is a must-have feature for you, check these sections:
Top Compact Cameras with Weather Sealing

LCD Screen Size and Features

Canon ELPH 350 HS and Fujifilm XQ2's LCD screens have the same diagonal size of 3.00 inches.

Unfortunately, both cameras has fixed screens so they don't tilt or flip in directions.


Canon ELPH 350 HS vs Fujifilm XQ2: Sensor Comparison

Canon ELPH 350 HS has a 20.0MP 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm ) sized BSI-CMOS sensor and features DIGIC 4+ processor. On the other hand, Fujifilm XQ2 has a 12.0MP 2/3' (8.8 x 6.6 mm ) sized CMOS X-TRANS II sensor and features EXR Processor II processor.

Canon ELPH 350 HS's sensor provides 8MP more than Fujifilm XQ2's sensor, which gives a significant advantage in real life. You can print your images larger or crop more freely. On the other hand, please keep in mind that Max sensor resolution is not the only determinant of resolving power. Factors such as the optical elements, low pass filter, pixel size and sensor technology also affects the final resolution of the captured image.

Below you can see the 350 HS and XQ2 sensor size comparison.

Canon ELPH 350 HS vs Fujifilm XQ2 Sensor Size Comparison
Sensor Size and Resolution Comparison image of Canon ELPH 350 HS and Fujifilm XQ2 Cameras


As seen above, Fujifilm XQ2 has a 2.1x Larger sensor area than Canon ELPH 350 HS. Larger sensors give photographer more control on the depth of field and blurry background compared to smaller sensor when shot in same focal length and aperture.

Canon ELPH 350 HS vs Fujifilm XQ2 Lens Specs Comparison

Canon ELPH 350 HS features a 25-300 mm F3.6-7.0 12x zoom lens whereas Fujifilm XQ2 features a 25-100 mm F1.8-4.9 4× zoom lens.

Both cameras have a wide angle coverage of 25mm. On the other hand, with a max aperture of f1.80, Fujifilm XQ2 is faster than Canon ELPH 350 HS at this focal length. On the tele end, Canon ELPH 350 HS has 200mm longer reach than the Fujifilm XQ2. However, with a max aperture of f4.90, Fujifilm XQ2 is faster at tele end.

Wide Coverage

Compact Cameras

350 HS
XQ2
Widest - Olympus TG-850 iHS
Average
Telezoom

Compact Cameras

350 HS
XQ2
Longest - Canon SX520 HS
Average
Max Aperture at Tele

Compact Cameras

350 HS
XQ2
Fastest - Ricoh GR Digital IV
Average
Max Aperture at Wide

Compact Cameras

350 HS
XQ2
Fastest - Leica D-Lux 6
Average
What types of Photography are Canon ELPH 350 HS and Fujifilm XQ2 Good for?
In this section, we rank and compare Canon ELPH 350 HS and Fujifilm XQ2 for five different photography types in order to make your decision process easier in case you are specifically interested in one or more of these areas.

Canon ELPH 350 HS for Portrait Photography

POOR

Fujifilm XQ2 for Portrait Photography

AVERAGE
Very High Resolution Sensor: 20.0MP
Image Stabilization
Small 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor
No RAW shooting capability
No External Flash Shoe
No Built-in Viewfinder
No Manual Focus Mode
No Manual Exposure Mode
Not so good Ergonomics&Handling
Read the details
Image Stabilization
RAW shooting capability
Manual Focus Mode
Manual Exposure Mode
Average Resolution Sensor: 12.0MP
Small 2/3" (8.8 x 6.6 mm) sensor
No External Flash Shoe
No Built-in Viewfinder
Not so good Ergonomics&Handling
Read the details

Canon ELPH 350 HS for Street Photography

AVERAGE

Fujifilm XQ2 for Street Photography

GOOD
Image Stabilization
Small Body
Live-view
Face-Detection Focusing
25 mm - Good Wide Angle Coverage
Small 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor
No RAW shooting capability
No Built-in Viewfinder
No Manual Focus Mode
Slow Lens at Wide: f3.60
Read the details
Image Stabilization
RAW shooting capability
Manual Focus Mode
Small Body
Live-view
Face-Detection Focusing
Fast Lens at Wide: f1.80
25 mm - Good Wide Angle Coverage
Small 2/3" (8.8 x 6.6 mm) sensor
No Built-in Viewfinder
Read the details

Canon ELPH 350 HS for Sports Photography

POOR

Fujifilm XQ2 for Sports Photography

POOR
Image Stabilization
Wireless Connection
300 mm Tele Lens
Average Max shutter speed: 1/2000s
No RAW shooting capability
No External Flash Shoe
No Built-in Viewfinder
No Manual Focus Mode
No Manual Exposure Mode
Not so good Ergonomics&Handling
Slow Continuous Shooting: 2.5fps
Environmental Sealings
9 Focus Points
Poor Battery Life: 250 shots
Slow Lens at Tele: f7.00
Read the details
Image Stabilization
RAW shooting capability
Manual Focus Mode
Manual Exposure Mode
Fast Continuous Shooting: 12.0fps
Fast Max shutter speed: 1/4000s
Wireless Connection
No External Flash Shoe
No Built-in Viewfinder
Not so good Ergonomics&Handling
Environmental Sealings
Focus Points
Poor Battery Life: 240 shots
100 mm Tele Lens
Read the details

Canon ELPH 350 HS for Daily Photography

AVERAGE

Fujifilm XQ2 for Daily Photography

GOOD
Compact Body
147g
12.0X Optical Zoom
Small 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor
No RAW shooting capability
Read the details
RAW shooting capability
Compact Body
206g
4.0X Optical Zoom
Small 2/3" (8.8 x 6.6 mm) sensor
Read the details

Canon ELPH 350 HS for Landscape Photography

POOR

Fujifilm XQ2 for Landscape Photography

POOR
Very High Resolution Sensor: 20.0MP
25 mm - Good Wide Angle Coverage
Small 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor
No RAW shooting capability
No Manual Focus Mode
No Manual Exposure Mode
No Environmental Sealings
Read the details
RAW shooting capability
Manual Focus Mode
Manual Exposure Mode
25 mm - Good Wide Angle Coverage
Average Resolution Sensor: 12.0MP
Small 2/3" (8.8 x 6.6 mm) sensor
No Environmental Sealings
Read the details

Canon ELPH 350 HS vs Fujifilm XQ2: OUR DECISION

You may have already made your decision about which camera suits better for your needs and your budget so far, but in case you wonder how we rated Canon ELPH 350 HS and Fujifilm XQ2, below you can find their scores in five different aspects. Our Decision Algorithm dynamically scores cameras using 69 different specs, current price and DxO Mark scores (where possible) in order to make a more objective and consistent comparison.

Here is a summary of how Canon ELPH 350 HS and Fujifilm XQ2 scores compare:

Canon ELPH 350 HS
Imaging
Features
Value
Portability
Overall
Ranked #20 out of 155 in Ultracompact cameras
Ranked #820 out of 1268 in all Cameras
Fujifilm XQ2
Imaging
Features
Value
Portability
Overall
Ranked #3 out of 155 in Ultracompact cameras
Ranked #479 out of 1268 in all Cameras

Fujifilm XQ2 is the overall winner of this comparison. It has a higher Overall Score and beats Canon ELPH 350 HS in all criteria except one: Portability.
If small size and light body is a big priority for you, choose Canon ELPH 350 HS. Otherwise, Fujifilm XQ2 is the better camera overall.

Canon ELPH 350 HS
Canon ELPH 350 HS
CHECK PRICE

CHECK PRICE

Fujifilm XQ2
Fujifilm XQ2
CHECK PRICE

CHECK PRICE

Fujifilm XQ2 vs Canon ELPH 350 HS Specs Table
Detailed comparison of specifications
General Canon PowerShot ELPH 350 HS Fujifilm XQ2
Brand Canon Fujifilm
Announced 2015-02-06 2015-01-14
Body Type Ultracompact Ultracompact
Sensor
Type BSI-CMOS CMOS X-TRANS II
Size 1/2.3" 2/3'
Dimensions 6.17 x 4.55 mm 8.8 x 6.6 mm
Area 28.07mm2 58.08mm2
Megapixels 20 megapixels 12 megapixels
Max Resolution 5184 x 3888 4000 x 3000
Max Native Light sensitivity 3,200 ISO 12,800 ISO
Min Native Light sensitivity 80 ISO 100 ISO
RAW Support
Autofocus
AF Touch
AF Continuous
AF Single
AF Tracking
AF Selective
AF Center
AF Multi Area
AF Live View
AF Face Detection
AF Contrast Detection
AF Phase Detection
Number of Focus Points 9 n/a
Lens
Manual Focus
Lens Mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens Focal Range 25-300 mm (12x) 25-100 mm (4×)
Max Aperture F3.6-7.0 F1.8-4.9
Macro Focus Range 1cm 3cm
Screen
Type Fixed type Fixed type
Size 3.00" 3.00"
Resolution 461k dots 920k dots
Touch Screen
Viewfinder
Viewfinder None None
Photography Features
Max Mechanical Shutter 1/2000s 1/4000s
Shutter Priority
Aperture Priority
Manual Exposure Mode
Custom White Balance
Built-in Image Stabilization Optical Optical
Built-in Flash
Flash Range 4.00 m 7.40 m (at Auto ISO)
External Flash
Continuous Shooting 2.5 fps 12.0 fps
Multi-Segment Metering
Average Metering
Spot Metering
Partial Metering
AF-Area Metering
Center Weighted Metering
AE Bracketing
WB Bracketing
Video Features
Max Video Resolution 1920 x 1080 1920 x 1080
Video Formats H.264 H.264
Microphone Port
Headphone Port
Connectivity
Wireless Connectivity Built-In Built-In
HDMI
Physical
Environmental Sealing
Weight 147g 206g
Dimensions 100 x 58 x 23mm 100 x 59 x 33mm
Battery Life 250 shots 240 shots
Other Features
Timelapse Recording
GPS Optional None
DxO Sensor Scores
Report a correction Report a correction


FOLLOW US


Most Popular Cameras
Sony A7R V
61 MP | Full frame Sensor | Sony E Mount
Canon R8
24 MP | Full frame Sensor | Canon RF Mount
Sony A7 IV
33 MP | Full frame Sensor | Sony E Mount
Canon R50
24 MP | APS-C Sensor | Canon RF Mount
Sony ZV-E1
12 MP | Full frame Sensor | Sony E Mount
Canon R6 II
24 MP | Full frame Sensor | Canon RF Mount
Leica Q2
47 MP | Full frame Sensor | 28 mm
Fujifilm X-T5
40 MP | APS-C Sensor | Fujifilm X Mount
Latest Cameras
Leica Q3
60 MP | Full frame Sensor | 28 mm
Canon R100
24 MP | APS-C Sensor | Canon RF Mount
Fujifilm X-S20
26 MP | APS-C Sensor | Fujifilm X Mount
Sony ZV-1 II
20 MP | 1″ Sensor | 18-50 mm
Nikon Z8
46 MP | Full frame Sensor | Nikon Z Mount
Pentax K-3 III Monochrome
26 MP | APS-C Sensor | Pentax KAF2 Mount
Leica M11 Monochrome
60 MP | Full frame Sensor | Leica M Mount
Sony ZV-E1
12 MP | Full frame Sensor | Sony E Mount
Copyright © 2023 by CameraDecision
Privacy About Contact Us SpeakerDecision LaptopDecision

Report a Correction