CameraDecision
  • CAMERAS
  • LENSES
  • TOOLS
    • Smart Find
    • 1-on-1 Comparison
    • Size Comparison
  • BRANDS
    • Sony Cameras
    • Canon Cameras
    • Nikon Cameras
    • Pentax Cameras
    • Fujifilm Cameras
    • Olympus Cameras
    • Panasonic Cameras
    • Leica Cameras
    • Samsung Cameras
  • BODY TYPE
    • Mirrorless Cameras
    • DSLR Cameras
    • Compact Cameras
    • Bridge Cameras
    • Waterproof Cameras

Canon ELPH 150 IS vs Olympus SP-820UZ Comparison

x
Camera to replace
Change

Canon ELPH 150 IS

20 MP | 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) CCD Sensor

Canon ELPH 150 IS
CHECK PRICE
CHECK PRICE
Change

Olympus SP-820UZ

14 MP | 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) CMOS Sensor

Olympus SP-820UZ
CHECK PRICE
CHECK PRICE
Canon ELPH 150 IS vs Olympus SP-820UZ Comparison Overview

Here we are comparing two Compact cameras from Canon and Olympus. Canon ELPH 150 IS was introduced to market in February 2014 and Olympus SP-820UZ was launched in August 2012. There is 18 months difference between ELPH 150 IS and SP-820UZ so we don't expect to see a huge technology difference between these two cameras but it would still give an advantage to younger ELPH 150 IS, especially in sensor tech.

Both cameras have 1/2.3" sensors but Canon ELPH 150 IS has a 20.0 MP and Olympus SP-820UZ has a 14.0 MP resolution.

Here is a brief look at the main features of Canon ELPH 150 IS and Olympus SP-820UZ before getting into our more detailed comparison.

Canon ELPH 150 IS Key Specs

  • Announcement Date: 2014-02-12
  • 20MP - 1/2.3" CCD Sensor
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • 24-240 mm F3.0-6.9 Zoom Lens
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 2.7" Fixed Type Screen
  • 1 fps continuous shooting
  • HD - 1280 x 720 video resolution
  • 142g. 95 x 57 x 24 mm
  • Also known as IXUS 155

Olympus SP-820UZ Key Specs

  • Announcement Date: 2012-08-21
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" CMOS Sensor
  • ISO 80 - 6400
  • 22-896 mm F3.4-5.7 Zoom Lens
  • 3" Fixed Type Screen
  • 2 fps continuous shooting
  • Full HD - 1920 x 1080 video resolution
  • 240 fps High-Speed Video
  • 485g. 117 x 78 x 93 mm mm
  • Replaced Olympus Stylus SP-820UZ Compare

Let's read on the following sections in order to better understand in detail how Canon ELPH 150 IS and Olympus SP-820UZ compares and hopefully end up with enough arguments to decide which one is better for you.

Reasons to choose Canon PowerShot ELPH 150 IS over Olympus Stylus SP-820UZ
Image Stabilization
Optical vs None Sharper images at longer focal lengths and long exposures
Max Sensor Resolution
20 MP vs 14 MP 42% more pixels
Weight
142 g vs 485 g 343 g lighter
Max Aperture - Wide
3.00 vs 3.40 faster lens at wide


Reasons to choose Olympus Stylus SP-820UZ over Canon PowerShot ELPH 150 IS
Face Detection Focus
Yes vs No very handy for portraits
Max ISO
6.400 vs 1.600 300% higher Max ISO
LCD Screen Size
3" vs 2.7" 0.3 inches larger display
LCD Screen Resolution
460k dots vs 230k dots 100% higher resolution screen
Continuous Shooting
2.0fps vs 1.0fps 1 fps faster
Focal Length - Wide
22mm vs 24mm 2 mm wider coverage
Focal Length - Tele
896mm vs 240mm 656 mm longer tele reach
Optical Zoom
40× vs 10× more flexible focal coverage
Max Aperture - Tele
5.70 vs 6.90 faster lens at tele
Flash Coverage
15.0m vs 4.0m 11m longer range
Sensor Pixel Area
2.04µm2 vs 1.41µm2 44% larger pixel area
Max Video Resolution
1920 x 1080 vs 1280 x 720 Higher Resolution Video

Common Strengths of Canon PowerShot ELPH 150 IS and Olympus Stylus SP-820UZ
Built-in Flash
Yes vs Yes Useful in low-light
Focal Length - Wide
24mm vs 22mm Very good wide angle coverage
Focal Length - Tele
240mm vs 896mm Very good Telezoom
Common Weaknesses of Canon PowerShot ELPH 150 IS and Olympus Stylus SP-820UZ
Fixed Screen
Fixed Type vs No No flexible viewing angles
External Flash Shoe
No vs No Not suitable for flash photography
Viewfinder
None vs None No eye-level shooting option
RAW Support
No vs No Lower image quality
LCD Screen Resolution
230k dots vs 460k dots Low resolution screens
Continuous Shooting
1.0fps vs 2.0fps Slow shooting speeds
Manual Focusing
No vs No No manual focusing modes
Manual Exposure
No vs No No manual exposure control
Environmental Sealing
No vs No not suitable for tough conditions
Max Aperture - Tele
6.90 vs 5.70 Slow lenses at tele
Canon ELPH 150 IS vs Olympus SP-820UZ: Physical Specs and Body features Comparison

Size and weight is a big decision factor when you are trying to find the ideal camera for your needs. In this section, We are going to illustrate Canon ELPH 150 IS and Olympus SP-820UZ side-by-side from the front, back and top in their relative dimensions. Canon ELPH 150 IS has external dimensions of 95 x 57 x 24 mm (3.74 x 2.24 x 0.94″) and weighs 142 g (0.31 lb / 5.01 oz) (including batteries). Olympus SP-820UZ has external dimensions of and weighs 485 g (1.07 lb / 17.11 oz) (including batteries).

Below you can see the front view size comparison of Canon ELPH 150 IS and Olympus SP-820UZ. Canon ELPH 150 IS is clearly the smaller of the two cameras. Its body is 22mm narrower, 21mm shorter and 69mm thinner than Olympus SP-820UZ.

Canon ELPH 150 IS vs Olympus SP-820UZ Camera Size Comparison - Front View
Comparison image of Canon ELPH 150 IS and Olympus SP-820UZ Size, Weight and External Dimensions - Front View

Now lets look at the top view comparison of Canon ELPH 150 IS and Olympus SP-820UZ.
Canon ELPH 150 IS vs Olympus SP-820UZ Camera Size Comparison - Top View
Top View Comparison image of Canon ELPH 150 IS and Olympus SP-820UZ Size

Weight is another important factor especially when deciding on a camera that you want to carry with you all day. Canon ELPH 150 IS is significantly lighter (343g ) than the Olympus SP-820UZ which may become a big advantage especially on long walking trips.

Weight Comparison

Compact Cameras

ELPH 150 IS
SP-820UZ
Min
Average
Max
Thickness Comparison

Compact Cameras

ELPH 150 IS
SP-820UZ
Min
Average
Max

Weather Sealing

Unfortunately neither Canon PowerShot ELPH 150 IS (IXUS 155) nor Olympus Stylus SP-820UZ provides any type of weather sealing in their body, so you have to give extra care especially when you are shooting outdoors. If weather sealing is a must-have feature for you, check these sections:
Top Compact Cameras with Weather Sealing

LCD Screen Size and Features

Olympus SP-820UZ's 3" LCD screen is slightly larger than Canon ELPH 150 IS's 2.7" screen.

Unfortunately, both cameras has fixed screens so they don't tilt or flip in directions.
Canon ELPH 150 IS vs Olympus SP-820UZ: Sensor Comparison

Canon ELPH 150 IS has a 20.0MP 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm ) sized CCD sensor and features Digic 4+ processor. On the other hand, Olympus SP-820UZ has a 14.0MP 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm ) sized CMOS sensor .

Canon ELPH 150 IS's sensor provides 6MP more than Olympus SP-820UZ's sensor, which gives a significant advantage in real life. You can print your images larger or crop more freely. On the other hand, please keep in mind that Max sensor resolution is not the only determinant of resolving power. Factors such as the optical elements, low pass filter, pixel size and sensor technology also affects the final resolution of the captured image.

Below you can see the ELPH 150 IS and SP-820UZ sensor size comparison.

Canon ELPH 150 IS vs Olympus SP-820UZ Sensor Size Comparison
Sensor Size and Resolution Comparison image of Canon ELPH 150 IS and Olympus SP-820UZ Cameras


Canon ELPH 150 IS and Olympus SP-820UZ have sensor sizes so they will provide same level of control over the depth of field when used with same focal length and aperture. On the other hand, since Olympus SP-820UZ has 44% larger pixel area (2.04µm2 vs 1.41µm2) compared to Canon ELPH 150 IS, it has larger pixel area to collect light hence potential to have less noise in low light / High ISO images.

Canon ELPH 150 IS vs Olympus SP-820UZ Lens Specs Comparison

Canon ELPH 150 IS features a 24-240 mm F3.0-6.9 10× zoom lens whereas Olympus SP-820UZ features a 22-896 mm F3.4-5.7 40× zoom lens.

Olympus SP-820UZ has 2mm wider coverage than the Canon ELPH 150 IS. On the other hand, with a max aperture of f3.00, Canon ELPH 150 IS is faster at widest end. On the tele end, Olympus SP-820UZ has 656mm longer reach than the Canon ELPH 150 IS. At f5.70, it is also faster at tele end.

Wide Coverage

Compact Cameras

ELPH 150 IS
SP-820UZ
Widest - Ricoh WG-M1
Average
Telezoom

Compact Cameras

ELPH 150 IS
SP-820UZ
Longest - Canon SX520 HS
Average
Max Aperture at Tele

Compact Cameras

ELPH 150 IS
SP-820UZ
Fastest - Ricoh GR Digital IV
Average
Max Aperture at Wide

Compact Cameras

ELPH 150 IS
SP-820UZ
Fastest - Leica D-Lux 6
Average
What types of Photography are Canon ELPH 150 IS and Olympus SP-820UZ Good for?
In this section, we rank and compare Canon ELPH 150 IS and Olympus SP-820UZ for five different photography types in order to make your decision process easier in case you are specifically interested in one or more of these areas.

Canon ELPH 150 IS for Portrait Photography

POOR

Olympus SP-820UZ for Portrait Photography

POOR
Very High Resolution Sensor: 20.0MP
Image Stabilization
Small 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor
No RAW shooting capability
No External Flash Shoe
No Built-in Viewfinder
No Manual Focus Mode
No Manual Exposure Mode
Not so good Ergonomics&Handling
Read the details
Average Resolution Sensor: 14.0MP
Small 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor
No Image Stabilization
No RAW shooting capability
No External Flash Shoe
No Built-in Viewfinder
No Manual Focus Mode
No Manual Exposure Mode
Not so good Ergonomics&Handling
Read the details

Canon ELPH 150 IS for Street Photography

AVERAGE

Olympus SP-820UZ for Street Photography

POOR
Image Stabilization
Small Body
Live-view
24 mm - Good Wide Angle Coverage
Small 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor
No RAW shooting capability
No Built-in Viewfinder
No Manual Focus Mode
Read the details
Small Body
Live-view
Face-Detection Focusing
22 mm - Good Wide Angle Coverage
Small 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor
No Image Stabilization
No RAW shooting capability
No Built-in Viewfinder
No Manual Focus Mode
Read the details

Canon ELPH 150 IS for Sports Photography

POOR

Olympus SP-820UZ for Sports Photography

POOR
Image Stabilization
240 mm Tele Lens
Average Max shutter speed: 1/2000s
No RAW shooting capability
No External Flash Shoe
No Built-in Viewfinder
No Manual Focus Mode
No Manual Exposure Mode
Not so good Ergonomics&Handling
Slow Continuous Shooting: 1.0fps
Environmental Sealings
9 Focus Points
Poor Battery Life: 230 shots
Slow Lens at Tele: f6.90
Read the details
896 mm Tele Lens
Average Max shutter speed: 1/2000s
No Image Stabilization
No RAW shooting capability
No External Flash Shoe
No Built-in Viewfinder
No Manual Focus Mode
No Manual Exposure Mode
Not so good Ergonomics&Handling
Slow Continuous Shooting: 2.0fps
Environmental Sealings
Unknown Focus Points
Slow Lens at Tele: f5.70
Read the details

Canon ELPH 150 IS for Daily Photography

GOOD

Olympus SP-820UZ for Daily Photography

AVERAGE
Compact Body
142g
10.0X Optical Zoom
Small 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor
No RAW shooting capability
Read the details
Compact Body
40.7X Optical Zoom
Small 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor
No RAW shooting capability
485g
Body Thickness 93mm
Read the details

Canon ELPH 150 IS for Landscape Photography

POOR

Olympus SP-820UZ for Landscape Photography

POOR
Very High Resolution Sensor: 20.0MP
24 mm - Good Wide Angle Coverage
Small 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor
No RAW shooting capability
No Manual Focus Mode
No Manual Exposure Mode
No Environmental Sealings
Read the details
22 mm - Good Wide Angle Coverage
Average Resolution Sensor: 14.0MP
Small 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor
No RAW shooting capability
No Manual Focus Mode
No Manual Exposure Mode
No Environmental Sealings
Read the details

Canon ELPH 150 IS vs Olympus SP-820UZ: OUR DECISION

You may have already made your decision about which camera suits better for your needs and your budget so far but in case you wonder how we rated Canon ELPH 150 IS and Olympus SP-820UZ, below you can find their scores in five different aspects. Our Decision Algorithm dynamically scores cameras using 63 different specs, current price and DxO Mark scores (where possible) in order to make a more objective and consistent comparison.

Here is a summary of how Canon ELPH 150 IS and Olympus SP-820UZ scores compare:

Canon ELPH 150 IS
Imaging
Features
Value
Portability
Overall
Ranked #94 out of 155 in Ultracompact cameras
Ranked #1051 out of 1220 in all Cameras
Olympus SP-820UZ
Imaging
Features
Value
Portability
Overall
Ranked #394 out of 475 in Compact cameras
Ranked #1073 out of 1220 in all Cameras

Canon ELPH 150 IS
Canon ELPH 150 IS
CHECK PRICE

CHECK PRICE

Olympus SP-820UZ
Olympus SP-820UZ
CHECK PRICE

CHECK PRICE

Olympus SP-820UZ vs Canon ELPH 150 IS Specs Table
Detailed comparison of specifications
General Canon PowerShot ELPH 150 IS Olympus Stylus SP-820UZ
Brand Canon Olympus
Announced 2014-02-12 2012-08-21
Body Type Ultracompact Compact
Sensor
Type CCD CMOS
Size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Dimensions 6.17 x 4.55 mm 6.17 x 4.55 mm
Area 28.07mm2 28.07mm2
Megapixels 20 megapixels 14 megapixels
Max Resolution 5152 x 3864 4288 x 3216
Max Native Light sensitivity 1,600 ISO 6,400 ISO
Min Native Light sensitivity 100 ISO 80 ISO
RAW Support
Autofocus
AF Touch
AF Continuous
AF Single
AF Tracking
AF Selective
AF Center
AF Multi Area
AF Live View
AF Face Detection
AF Contrast Detection
AF Phase Detection
Number of Focus Points 9 n/a
Lens
Manual Focus
Lens Mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens Focal Range 24-240 mm (10×) 22-896 mm (40×)
Max Aperture F3.0-6.9 F3.4-5.7
Macro Focus Range 1cm 1cm
Screen
Type Fixed type Fixed type
Size 2.7" 3"
Resolution 230k dots 460k dots
Touch Screen
Viewfinder
Viewfinder None None
Photography Features
Max Mechanical Shutter 1/2000s 1/2000s
Shutter Priority
Aperture Priority
Manual Exposure Mode
Custom White Balance
Image Stabilization Optical No
Built-in Flash
Flash Range 4.00 m 15.00 m
External Flash
Continuous Shooting 1.0 fps 2.0 fps
Multi-Segment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF-Area
Center Weighted
AE Bracketing
WB Bracketing
Video Features
Max Video Resolution 1280 x 720 1920 x 1080
Video Formats H.264 MPEG-4, H.264
Microphone Port
Headphone Port
Connectivity
Wireless Connectivity None None
HDMI
Physical
Environmental Sealing
Weight 142g 485g
Dimensions 95 x 57 x 24mm 117 x 78 x 93 mmmm
Battery Life 230 shots n/a
Other Features
Timelapse Recording
GPS None None
DxO Sensor Scores
Report a correction Report a correction


FOLLOW US


Most Popular Cameras
Nikon Z7
46 MP | Full frame Sensor | Nikon Z Mount
Sony A6000
24 MP | APS-C Sensor | Sony E Mount
Sony A7 III
24 MP | Full frame Sensor | Sony E Mount
Fujifilm X-T3
26 MP | APS-C Sensor | Fujifilm X Mount
Canon R
30 MP | Full frame Sensor | Canon RF Mount
Sony A6400
24 MP | APS-C Sensor | Sony E Mount
Nikon D5600
24 MP | APS-C Sensor | Nikon F Mount
Nikon D850
46 MP | Full frame Sensor | Nikon F Mount
Top Rated Compact Cameras
Top Cameras Under $200
Top Compact Cameras Under $500
Top Compact Cameras Under $750
Top Compact Cameras Under $1000
Latest Cameras
Leica SL2-S
24 MP | Full frame Sensor | Leica L Mount
Leica Q2 Monochrom
47 MP | Full frame Sensor | 28 mm
Fujifilm X-S10
26 MP | APS-C Sensor | Fujifilm X Mount
Nikon Z7 II
46 MP | Full frame Sensor | Nikon Z Mount
Nikon Z6 II
25 MP | Full frame Sensor | Nikon Z Mount
Canon M50 II
24 MP | APS-C Sensor | Canon EF-M Mount
Sony A7c
24 MP | Full frame Sensor | Sony E Mount
Panasonic S5
24 MP | Full frame Sensor | Leica L Mount
Copyright © 2020 by CameraDecision
About Feedback Privacy Cameras

Report a Correction