CameraDecision
  • CAMERAS
  • LENSES
  • TOOLS
    • Smart Find
    • 1-on-1 Comparison
    • Size Comparison
  • BRANDS
    • Sony Cameras
    • Canon Cameras
    • Nikon Cameras
    • Pentax Cameras
    • Fujifilm Cameras
    • Olympus Cameras
    • Panasonic Cameras
    • Leica Cameras
    • Samsung Cameras
  • BODY TYPE
    • Mirrorless Cameras
    • DSLR Cameras
    • Compact Cameras
    • Bridge Cameras
    • Waterproof Cameras

Canon A495 vs Olympus TG-4 Comparison

x
Camera to replace
Change

Canon A495

10 MP | 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) CCD Sensor

Canon A495
CHECK PRICE
CHECK PRICE
Change

Olympus TG-4

16 MP | 1/2.3 BSI-CMOS Sensor

Olympus TG-4
CHECK PRICE
CHECK PRICE
Canon A495 vs Olympus TG-4 Comparison Overview

Here we are comparing two cameras with different body types: Canon A495, which was introduced in January 2010 is a Small Sensor Compact camera with a 10.0MP 1/2.3-inch sensor whereas Olympus TG-4, which was introduced in April 2015 is a Waterproof camera with a 16.0MP 1/2.3-inch sensor. As you can see, A495 is 5 years older than TG-4. Let's see if this age difference between two cameras makes a big difference.

Here is a brief look at the main features of Canon A495 and Olympus TG-4 before getting into our more detailed comparison.

Canon A495 Key Specs

  • Announcement Date: 2010-01-05
  • 10MP - 1/2.3-inch CCD Sensor
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 37-122 mm F3.0-5.8 Zoom Lens
  • 2.5" Fixed Type Screen
  • 1 fps continuous shooting
  • - 640 x 480 video resolution
  • 175g. 94 x 62 x 31 mm

Olympus TG-4 Key Specs

  • Announcement Date: 2015-04-13
  • 16MP - 1/2.3-inch BSI-CMOS Sensor
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • 25-100 mm F2.0-4.9 Zoom Lens
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 3" Fixed Type Screen
  • 5.0 fps continuous shooting
  • Full HD - 1920 x 1080 video resolution
  • Built-in Wireless
  • Built-in GPS
  • 247g. 112 x 66 x 31 mm
  • Weather Sealed Body
  • Replaced Olympus Tough TG-3 Compare

Olympus TG-4 was replaced by Olympus Tough TG-5. You may also be interested in these comparisons:
Olympus Tough TG-5 vs Olympus Tough TG-4
Olympus Tough TG-5 vs Canon PowerShot A495

Let's read on the following sections in order to better understand in detail how Canon A495 and Olympus TG-4 compares and hopefully end up with enough arguments to decide which one is better for you.

Reasons to choose Canon PowerShot A495 over Olympus Tough TG-4
Weight
175 g vs 247 g 72 g lighter
Focal Length - Tele
122mm vs 100mm 22 mm longer tele reach
Sensor Pixel Area
2.81µm2 vs 1.76µm2 59% larger pixel area


Reasons to choose Olympus Tough TG-4 over Canon PowerShot A495
Wireless Connection
Built-In vs None Better connectivity
Live Composite Mode
Yes vs No Excellent help for long-exposure photography
Image Stabilization
Sensor-shift vs None Sharper images at longer focal lengths and long exposures
GPS
BuiltIn vs None track your location
RAW Support
Yes vs No Better image quality
Face Detection Focus
Yes vs No very handy for portraits
Max Sensor Resolution
16 MP vs 10 MP 60% more pixels
Max ISO
6.400 vs 1.600 300% higher Max ISO
Number of Focus Points
25 vs 9 16 more focus points
LCD Screen Size
3" vs 2.5" 0.5 inches larger display
LCD Screen Resolution
460k dots vs 115k dots 300% higher resolution screen
Continuous Shooting
5.0fps vs 1.0fps 4 fps faster
Environmental Sealing
Yes vs No shoot at tough conditions
Timelapse Recording
Yes vs No creative shooting
Focal Length - Wide
25mm vs 37mm 12 mm wider coverage
Optical Zoom
4x vs 3.3× more flexible focal coverage
Max Aperture - Wide
2.00 vs 3.00 faster lens at wide
Max Aperture - Tele
4.90 vs 5.80 faster lens at tele
Flash Coverage
7.9m vs 3.0m 4.9m longer range
Max Video Resolution
1920 x 1080 vs 640 x 480 Higher Resolution Video
Focus Bracketing
Yes vs No Take multiple photos shifting focus point
Focus Stacking
Yes vs No Stacks photos in-camera to maximize depth of field
Smartphone Remote
Yes vs No Remote control your camera with a smartphone

Common Strengths of Canon PowerShot A495 and Olympus Tough TG-4
Built-in Flash
Yes vs Yes Useful in low-light
Common Weaknesses of Canon PowerShot A495 and Olympus Tough TG-4
Fixed Screen
Fixed Type vs No No flexible viewing angles
External Flash Shoe
No vs No Not suitable for flash photography
Viewfinder
None vs None No eye-level shooting option
LCD Screen Resolution
115k dots vs 460k dots Low resolution screens
Manual Exposure
No vs No No manual exposure control
AE Bracketing
No vs No Not good for multi-exposure HDR
Canon A495 vs Olympus TG-4: Physical Specs and Body features Comparison

Size and weight is a big decision factor when you are trying to find the ideal camera for your needs. In this section, We are going to illustrate Canon A495 and Olympus TG-4 side-by-side from the front, back and top in their relative dimensions. Canon A495 has external dimensions of 94 x 62 x 31 mm (3.7 x 2.44 x 1.22″) and weighs 175 g (0.39 lb / 6.17 oz) (including batteries). Olympus TG-4 has external dimensions of 112 x 66 x 31 mm (4.41 x 2.6 x 1.22″) and weighs 247 g (0.54 lb / 8.71 oz) (including batteries).

Below you can see the front view size comparison of Canon A495 and Olympus TG-4.

Canon A495 vs Olympus TG-4 Camera Size Comparison - Front View
Comparison image of Canon A495 and Olympus TG-4 Size, Weight and External Dimensions - Front View

Weight is another important factor especially when deciding on a camera that you want to carry with you all day. Canon A495 is significantly lighter (72g ) than the Olympus TG-4 which may become a big advantage especially on long walking trips.

Weight Comparison

Waterproof Cameras

A495
TG-4
Min
Average
Max
Thickness Comparison

Waterproof Cameras

A495
TG-4
Min
Average
Max

Weather Sealing

LCD Screen Size and Features

Olympus TG-4's 3" LCD screen is slightly larger than Canon A495's 2.5" screen.

Unfortunately, both cameras has fixed screens so they don't tilt or flip in directions.
Canon A495 vs Olympus TG-4: Sensor Comparison

Canon A495 has a 10.0MP 1/2.3-inch (6.17 x 4.55 mm ) sized CCD sensor . On the other hand, Olympus TG-4 has a 16.0MP 1/2.3-inch (6.17 x 4.55 mm ) sized BSI-CMOS sensor and features TruePic VII processor.

Olympus TG-4's sensor provides 6MP more than Canon A495's sensor, which gives a significant advantage in real life. You can print your images larger or crop more freely. On the other hand, please keep in mind that Max sensor resolution is not the only determinant of resolving power. Factors such as the optical elements, low pass filter, pixel size and sensor technology also affects the final resolution of the captured image.

Below you can see the A495 and TG-4 sensor size comparison.

Canon A495 vs Olympus TG-4 Sensor Size Comparison
Sensor Size and Resolution Comparison image of Canon A495 and Olympus TG-4 Cameras


Canon A495 and Olympus TG-4 have sensor sizes so they will provide same level of control over the depth of field when used with same focal length and aperture. On the other hand, since Canon A495 has 59% larger pixel area compared to Olympus TG-4, it has potential to collect more light on pixel level hence have less noise in low light / High ISO images.

Canon A495 vs Olympus TG-4 Lens Specs Comparison

Canon A495 features a 37-122 mm F3.0-5.8 3.3× zoom lens whereas Olympus TG-4 features a 25-100 mm F2.0-4.9 4x zoom lens.

Olympus TG-4 has 12mm wider coverage than the Canon A495. At f2.00, it is also faster at widest end. On the tele end, Canon A495 has 22mm longer reach than the Olympus TG-4. However, with a max aperture of f4.90, Olympus TG-4 is faster at tele end.

Wide Coverage

Compact Cameras

A495
TG-4
Widest - Ricoh WG-M1
Average
Telezoom

Compact Cameras

A495
TG-4
Longest - Canon SX520 HS
Average
Max Aperture at Tele

Compact Cameras

A495
TG-4
Fastest - Ricoh GR Digital IV
Average
Max Aperture at Wide

Compact Cameras

A495
TG-4
Fastest - Leica D-Lux 6
Average
What types of Photography are Canon A495 and Olympus TG-4 Good for?
In this section, we rank and compare Canon A495 and Olympus TG-4 for five different photography types in order to make your decision process easier in case you are specifically interested in one or more of these areas.

Canon A495 for Portrait Photography

POOR

Olympus TG-4 for Portrait Photography

AVERAGE
Small 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor
Very Low Resolution Sensor: 10.0MP
No Image Stabilization
No RAW shooting capability
No External Flash Shoe
No Built-in Viewfinder
No Manual Focus Mode
No Manual Exposure Mode
Not so good Ergonomics&Handling
Read the details
Image Stabilization
RAW shooting capability
Manual Focus Mode
Average Resolution Sensor: 16.0MP
Small 1/2.3 sensor
No External Flash Shoe
No Built-in Viewfinder
No Manual Exposure Mode
Not so good Ergonomics&Handling
Read the details

Canon A495 for Street Photography

POOR

Olympus TG-4 for Street Photography

GOOD
Small Body
Live-view
Small 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor
No Image Stabilization
No RAW shooting capability
No Built-in Viewfinder
No Manual Focus Mode
37 mm - Poor Wide Angle Coverage
Read the details
Image Stabilization
RAW shooting capability
Manual Focus Mode
Small Body
Live-view
Face-Detection Focusing
Fast Lens at Wide: f2.00
25 mm - Good Wide Angle Coverage
Small 1/2.3 sensor
No Built-in Viewfinder
Read the details

Canon A495 for Sports Photography

POOR

Olympus TG-4 for Sports Photography

POOR
Average Max shutter speed: 1/2000s
122 mm Tele Lens
No Image Stabilization
No RAW shooting capability
No External Flash Shoe
No Built-in Viewfinder
No Manual Focus Mode
No Manual Exposure Mode
Not so good Ergonomics&Handling
Slow Continuous Shooting: 1.0fps
Environmental Sealings
9 Focus Points
Slow Lens at Tele: f5.80
Read the details
Image Stabilization
RAW shooting capability
Manual Focus Mode
Environmental Sealings
25 Focus Points
Wireless Connection
Average Continuous Shooting: 5.0fps
Average Max shutter speed: 1/2000s
No External Flash Shoe
No Built-in Viewfinder
No Manual Exposure Mode
Not so good Ergonomics&Handling
100 mm Tele Lens
Read the details

Canon A495 for Daily Photography

AVERAGE

Olympus TG-4 for Daily Photography

GOOD
Compact Body
175g
Small 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor
No RAW shooting capability
3.3X Optical Zoom
Read the details
RAW shooting capability
Compact Body
247g
Environmental Sealings
4.0X Optical Zoom
Small 1/2.3 sensor
Read the details

Canon A495 for Landscape Photography

POOR

Olympus TG-4 for Landscape Photography

POOR
Small 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor
Very Low Resolution Sensor: 10.0MP
No RAW shooting capability
No Manual Focus Mode
No Manual Exposure Mode
37 mm - Poor Wide Angle Coverage
No Environmental Sealings
Read the details
Manual Focus Mode
Environmental Sealings
Built-in GPS
25 mm - Good Wide Angle Coverage
Average Resolution Sensor: 16.0MP
Small 1/2.3 sensor
No Manual Exposure Mode
Read the details

Canon A495 vs Olympus TG-4: OUR DECISION

You may have already made your decision about which camera suits better for your needs and your budget so far but in case you wonder how we rated Canon A495 and Olympus TG-4, below you can find their scores in five different aspects. Our Decision Algorithm dynamically scores cameras using 63 different specs, current price and DxO Mark scores (where possible) in order to make a more objective and consistent comparison.

Here is a summary of how Canon A495 and Olympus TG-4 scores compare:

Canon A495
Imaging
Features
Value
Portability
Overall
Ranked #460 out of 475 in Compact cameras
Ranked #1186 out of 1226 in all Cameras
Olympus TG-4
Imaging
Features
Value
Portability
Overall
Ranked #18 out of 475 in Compact cameras
Ranked #336 out of 1226 in all Cameras

Olympus TG-4 is the overall winner of this comparison. It has a higher Overall Score and beats Canon A495 in all criteria except one: Portability.
If small size and light body is a big priority for you, choose Canon A495. Otherwise, Olympus TG-4 is the better camera overall.

Canon A495
Canon A495
CHECK PRICE

CHECK PRICE

Olympus TG-4
Olympus TG-4
CHECK PRICE

CHECK PRICE

Olympus TG-4 vs Canon A495 Specs Table
Detailed comparison of specifications
General Canon PowerShot A495 Olympus Tough TG-4
Brand Canon Olympus
Announced 2010-01-05 2015-04-13
Body Type Compact Compact
Sensor
Type CCD BSI-CMOS
Size 1/2.3-inch 1/2.3-inch
Dimensions 6.17 x 4.55 mm 6.17 x 4.55 mm
Area 28.07mm2 28.07mm2
Megapixels 10 megapixels 16 megapixels
Max Resolution 3648 x 2736 4608 x 3456
Max Native Light sensitivity 1,600 ISO 6,400 ISO
Min Native Light sensitivity 80 ISO 100 ISO
RAW Support
Autofocus
AF Touch
AF Continuous
AF Single
AF Tracking
AF Selective
AF Center
AF Multi Area
AF Live View
AF Face Detection
AF Contrast Detection
AF Phase Detection
Number of Focus Points 9 25
Lens
Manual Focus
Lens Mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens Focal Range 37-122 mm (3.3×) 25-100 mm (4x)
Max Aperture F3.0-5.8 F2.0-4.9
Macro Focus Range 1cm 1cm
Screen
Type Fixed type Fixed type
Size 2.5" 3"
Resolution 115k dots 460k dots
Touch Screen
Viewfinder
Viewfinder None None
Photography Features
Max Mechanical Shutter 1/2000s 1/2000s
Shutter Priority
Aperture Priority
Manual Exposure Mode
Custom White Balance
Image Stabilization No Sensor-shift
Built-in Flash
Flash Range 3.00 m 7.90 m (at ISO 1600)
External Flash
Continuous Shooting 1.0 fps 5.0 fps
Multi-Segment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF-Area
Center Weighted
AE Bracketing
WB Bracketing
Video Features
Max Video Resolution 640 x 480 1920 x 1080
Video Formats Motion JPEG H.264, Motion JPEG
Microphone Port
Headphone Port
Connectivity
Wireless Connectivity None Built-In
HDMI
Physical
Environmental Sealing
Weight 175g 247g
Dimensions 94 x 62 x 31mm 112 x 66 x 31mm
Battery Life n/a 380 shots
Other Features
Timelapse Recording
GPS None Built-in
DxO Sensor Scores
Report a correction Report a correction


FOLLOW US


Most Popular Cameras
Nikon Z7
46 MP | Full frame Sensor | Nikon Z Mount
Sony A6000
24 MP | APS-C Sensor | Sony E Mount
Sony A7 III
24 MP | Full frame Sensor | Sony E Mount
Fujifilm X-T3
26 MP | APS-C Sensor | Fujifilm X Mount
Canon R
30 MP | Full frame Sensor | Canon RF Mount
Sony A6400
24 MP | APS-C Sensor | Sony E Mount
Nikon D5600
24 MP | APS-C Sensor | Nikon F Mount
Nikon D850
46 MP | Full frame Sensor | Nikon F Mount
Top Rated Compact Cameras
Top Compact Cameras Under $200
Top Compact Cameras Under $500
Top Compact Cameras Under $750
Top Compact Cameras Under $1000
Top Rated Waterproof Cameras
Top Waterproof Cameras Under $200
Top Waterproof Cameras Under $500
Top Waterproof Cameras Under $750
Top Waterproof Cameras Under $1000
Latest Cameras
Pentax K-m
10 MP | APS-C Sensor | Pentax KAF2 Mount
Pentax K-3 III
26 MP | APS-C Sensor | Pentax KAF2 Mount
Sigma fp L
61 MP | Full frame Sensor | Leica L Mount
Fujifilm GFX 100S
102 MP | Medium format Sensor | Fujifilm G Mount
Fujifilm X-E4
26 MP | APS-C Sensor | Fujifilm X Mount
Sony a1
50 MP | Full frame Sensor | Sony E Mount
Leica SL2-S
24 MP | Full frame Sensor | Leica L Mount
Leica Q2 Monochrom
47 MP | Full frame Sensor | 28 mm
Copyright © 2021 by CameraDecision
About Feedback Privacy Cameras

Report a Correction